![]() |
(ii) |

Here
,
mV, and
mV. The numerical computation of eq. ii
requires that each term in curly brackets be averaged separately, since
the averages in the term
are determined only a posteriori, i.e., after the stimulus has been
presented.
Negative peak conductances are disallowed, since these would cause the
dynamical system to become unphysical. Thus, if eq. ii
were to lead to
at the next time step.
For the midpoint voltages of the activation functions,
![]() |
(iii) |
For the activation function slopes
,
we have
![]() |
(iv) |
The imposed restrictions on
,
,
imply that the parameter adaptation equations do not describe stochastic
gradient ascent on the mutual information or entropy.
Each average quantity is computed numerically by solving a differential
equation of the form
,where
is the duration of the stimulus. All told, there are
differential equations to solve in the presence of
modulatory dendritic conductances when each conductance has one activation
and one inactivation function. Eight of these equations are associated
with the spiking conductances in the somatic compartment.
An adaptive step size, 5th-order Runge-Kutta algorithm Press
et al. (1992) was used to integrate the set of 106 differential
equations with a relative error tolerance of
.
Note that the algorithm for information maximization is inherently stochastic,
and hence the effect of small, unbiased errors in the integration scheme
will be minimal.
Numerical simulations reveal that maximizing the information in the
firing rate by parameter adaptation depends only weakly on whether
and
are defined as in eq. i;
replacing these variables by the instantaneous or steady-state (in)activation
raised to the appropriate power, e.g.,
or
,will
lead to similar results.
The adapted peak conductances, midpoint voltages, and activation slopes
for the
and
conductances are listed in tables 3
through 6,
respectively, in the next section. The initial settings of these parameters
before adaptation are listed under initial
conditions.